Getting My case law on disciplinary proceedings To Work
Getting My case law on disciplinary proceedings To Work
Blog Article
33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives with the police would be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, be certain regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair to your offender plus the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair into the offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, along with the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release being a legally recognized conviction. Read more
This is because transfer orders are typically viewed as within the administrative discretion on the employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more
145 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically bring about exoneration from departmental charges based within the same factual grounds. Though a writ under Article 199 is available in specific limited situations, it is generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-look at witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't influence the department of his/her innocence.
Should you find an error within the written content of the published opinion (like a misspelled name or simply a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
Only the written opinions from the Supreme Court as well as the Court of Appeals are routinely obtainable. Decisions of your decreased (trial) courts are not generally published or dispersed.
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by legislation." It can be well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance with the respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account on the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set through the government.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and include things like all notable cases decided from the check here court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Preceding four tax years interpreted. It's not at all from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It is usually a nicely-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.